The above paragraph is the main code for ViewGroup to distribute events, which looks relatively simple. When the ViewGroup has a sub-view, the sub-view is traversed, and there is one judgment condition:
外星人入侵，打断了一场告别单身派对。两名儿时好友只好再度合体，变身当年的超猛雷射枪搭档，出手反击。
别说傻话。
万金集团总裁段苏洋遭遇袭击，身旁的保镖不堪一击，危机时刻女秘书叶雨晴挺身而出。经过一番激战，叶雨晴带着段苏洋突出重围，却不料遭到黑玫瑰伏击，叶雨晴身受重伤，她嘱咐段苏洋找到风依雪。逃出生天的段苏洋惊魂未定，他问安保队长王金龙谁是风依雪，王金龙告诉他，风依雪是退役的第一女保镖，隐居民间多年，行踪诡异，一般人很难找到她，正当两人无计可施时，一个妙龄女孩找上门来自称是风依雪。与此同时各路势力粉墨登场，开启了对风依雪和段苏洋的围剿。
Alibi和PBSMasterpiece联合制作6集罪案剧《安妮卡Annika》,改编自BBCRadio4非常成功的广播剧《AnnikaStranded》,由NickWalker创作。NicolaWalker饰演主角AnnikaStrandhed,一名敏锐,机智又神秘的督察。剧集讲述Annika领导一支新组建的海上凶案专家组,负责调查发生在苏格兰航道上原因不明,残忍恶劣,看上去难以解释的谋杀案。Annika管理着自己才华横溢但不走寻常路的团队,面对着同样聪慧但心思复杂的青少年女儿,在此过程中,她通过打破第四面墙的形式,让观众成为她的密友,分享她对案件和生活的带着讽刺意味的观察。
夜幕拉开，屋子里的灯火，早就熄灭了。
沉浸在幸福的预感之中，佳奈子对学院未来的生活充满了希望，这里果然是自己命运所在。但是，她却机缘巧合下发现鞠也的秘密：鞠也竟是男扮女装！
古代某县城的县令郭台和父母、丫环、师爷、衙役同住在衙门之内,他们之间不断地因为误解发生着有趣的故事。台与他们的想法不一样,为此时不时地发生冲突。 郭台断案表面糊涂,但是,每次都能断的清正廉明，衙门里的于师爷没事时全是主意,等到正事时,出的全是馊主意,给郭台找了不少的麻烦。县城有个地绅鲍瑜,为霸一方,经常做出恶事,郭台每次都能惩恶扬善,给鲍瑜教训。 衙门里来来往往的客人,围绕着他们也不时出现喜剧故事,比如:书圣茂才到衙门里来,老夫人为了不让郭台和虎妞相好,要将虎妞介绍给书生茂才成亲,郭台巧用计谋让茂才娶了赵财主的女儿,将虎妞继续留在了衙门之内,等等。
我们也不能光凭外表衣着去看人……她说得有些艰难，因为，要想把话说圆乎了，好像不大容易。
需要和将会起到的作用。
If you open multiple files at the same time, it is possible to chat with team members in multiple chat rooms. If you want to distinguish which chat records are related to the currently edited mind map, select "Current Map Message".
Some people think that the long-standing tension between regulatory authorities, public departments and financial institutions should at least bear part of the responsibility for network security accidents, because it is precisely because of this contradiction that enterprises often choose to make big things smaller and small things smaller.
天兵三号叶大同(钱君仲饰演)，一讲话就结巴，却拥有惊人的口技才华。当众新兵巴不得放假出营，到福利社把妹吃喝玩乐时，为什么大同却宁可待在成功岭受训？他到底有什么特殊的背景身份？
你对现在的生活不满？所以想要重生。
清末，古都北京有个叫桂山破落大户以房产抵押得到一只羽毛全白的白家雀，并由此引发出一连串曲折动人的故事。大妞、二妞姐妹因“白家雀之死”被骗进王爷府，结果大妞被王爷奸污后含恨而死；二妞不畏强暴，奋力反抗。最后在朋友们的帮助下，她逃出王爷府，奔向心目中向往的没有罪恶、充满善良自由的地方。
这些都好说。
葫芦和板栗先还没在意，只当是小乞丐，吩咐严师傅不要为难了他们，给些铜板让他们买包子吃。
This process is just speculation. I didn't analyze the source code in depth, but I typed a log and the result was that a series of dispatchTouchEvent () did return true. In other words, ViewGroup1 and ViewGroup2 did not have a consumption event, but dispatchTouchEvent () returned true, so an online saying: DispatchTouchEvent () returned true is a consumption event. This statement may not be completely accurate, but we still need to go to the source code to find the answer. We will not analyze it here, but only explain one problem: don't rewrite dispatchTouchEvent () easily. Even if overridden, try to ensure that the super method is called and the return value is consistent with the super result. In fact, the source code already provides two interfaces to indirectly rewrite it, namely onInterceptTouchEvent () and onTouchEvent (), which can be known from the source code that they are eventually called by dispatchTouchEvent (). Moreover, it is no problem to use the return value of onTouchEvent () to describe whether to consume the event (View that does not consume the event cannot call onTouchEvent () at all).
